The Feminist Furqan (criteria) replacing Allah’s Furqan (Quran)

Oh dear, predictably, another feminist known amongst the Muslim community, has just denied Quran’s (4:176) inheritance laws apparently under the guise of not needing to take them literally due to highly speculative ‘maqasid ul sharia’ (objectives of Islamic law) argument.

Screen Shot 2014-04-03 at 16.26.58

https://twitter.com/AbdullaAndalusi/status/451720466257154048

Of course the ‘maqasid argument’ is a typical strategy employed by modernists/reformers to reject explicit Islamic text, in favour of finding a way to get Muslims to believe in Western Liberal and Feminist concepts.

Many modernists argue that Muslims should adapt our laws to the ‘modern context’. Why? The Prophet Muhammed (saaw) didn’t make laws that accepted his status quo. If he (saaw) did, then Muslim Arabs would still be drinking alcohol, taking interest (riba), not needing to pray 5 times a day, and not fasting (the ‘context’ of Arabia is very hot, so who would think denying oneself water for one month is welcomed by any society?).

Surely if the Prophet (saaw) intended males not to be the providers, and females therefore to get full inheritance as providing males, he (and Allah) would have said so? I mean, women did work during the Prophet’s time, owning businesses, and even supporting their families, and joining the armed forces in some circumstances. If the Prophet (saaw) could make the stubborn Pagan Arabs give up idol worship, alcohol, fornication, interest and make them accept fasting without water for one month of the year in a hot climate – you think Allah and his Prophet would have found equalising inheritance easier between a providing male, and a female without dependents? I mean, even the Byzantine Roman culture DURING the Prophet’s time equalised inheritance in such circumstances, so why didn’t Muhammed (saaw) get the Feminist memo?

The reason is, Feminism and Liberalism are based upon a set of irrational assumptions about human nature, purpose and law, which is not based upon revelation or even rational observation, and consequently leads to absurd social solutions which do not concur with Human nature. God knows more about humans and our purpose then we do, and Islamic law (when fully applied by rational thinking Muslims) solved human problems for 1,300 years in a way no other ideology has since.

The irrational problem I find with some converts is, they convert into Islam for its universal truth and guidance, but then want to change it! It’s time they learn to leave their Liberal and Feminist baggage behind and be objective and rational. I left Liberalism to become a Muslim, and that meant being prepared to accept whatever the truth was – even if it was strange to my prior cultural experience.

With time, humans don’t fundamentally change, they still remain human with the same nature, only technology changes. To justify changing Islam or the sharia just because a people may live by a different culture, is not only irrational, but something Islam has encountered before – ending up with the culture (of those converting) changing to fit Islamic law, not the other way round.

The way modernists think is simple: 1) Islam believes Muslims must be just 2) Liberalism/Feminism is ‘just’, therefore 3) Islam believes Muslims must be Liberal and Feminist.

The problem here of course, is not just that Liberalism and Feminism are actually unjust in practice, but that they have been made the ‘furqan’ (criterion) of what is justice or not. Relegating the Quran to simply being a ‘cheerleader’ for the term ‘justice’ but silent on defining it or giving solutions to create justice.

Unfortunately, due to the current dominance of Liberalism and Feminism in global culture, many people have, like sheep, succumbed to it, parroting it’s terminology and following the herd. But just because people think that what their society or culture does seems good to them, is not a justification. As God says: ‘Thus have We made alluring to each people its own doings. In the end will they return to their Lord, and We shall then tell them the truth of all that they did’ (Quran 6:108).

“As to those who believe not in the Hereafter, We have made their deeds pleasing in their eyes; and so they wander about in distraction” (Quran 27:4)

As for the Maqasid argument, Imam Shatibi (who is viewed by all as one of the greatest scholars of Maqasid) perhaps knowing how in the future unscrupulous individuals may use it to deny clear texts said:

“There are many people who interpret legal evidences in the Quran according to how their own reason (aql) sees them and not in accordance with what is understood from its form [i.e. textual meaning]. In this is a grave error (fasad kabeer) and it is goes against the purposes of the Law-Giver”

‘”Violating the Shariah under the pretext of following the basic objectives or values of Shariah (Maqasid al Shariah) is like the one who cares about the spirit without the body and since the body without spirit is useless therefore the spirit without body is useless too”



Categories: ARTICLES, Feminism, WRITINGS

Tags: , ,

34 replies

  1. This article is good, and it would have been better if you didn’t mention specific names in it and made it general.

  2. I am a non muslim who is an ardent reader of Islamic theology, thought and shariah and even I totally appreciate where you’re coming from, Mr Andalusi. Not sure why many contemporary muslims are trying to paint a rosy picture of Islam with the colors of liberalism, while ignoring the inherent beauty in Islamic wisdom. I can only speculate that perhaps they don’t understand the deeper wisdom of Islam.

    I applaud you for posting such clear, succinct and coherent commentaries on day to day issues facing the Islamic community.

  3. Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh

    There is a bit of an issue with this article-the phrasing you use to refer to woman like her causes issues. I understand why you would want to refrain from takfir-in the modern age of confusion, it’s best to have things fully settle with a qadi (of which few, if any exist.)

    I also would like it if you did mention that rejecting a clear law in this deen is kufr-takfir is one of the most fundamental parts of fiqh, without which we would have disbeliever right left and center claiming his falsehood is valid in Islam.

    Other than that, keep up the good work and may Allah aza wa jal keep you firm.

  4. The way you speak of feminism is like it was some monolithic understanding of things, Feminism is as diverse as people in the world. I wish, this piece was written with a more nuanced understanding of what feminism or liberalism theories stand for and not what self proclaimed European activists make of them.

    • Thank you for the critique sister, its good to discuss these things. However I would somewhat disagree, as feminism (and Liberalism) is an intellectual tradition (not based upon a book, or exemplar figure). As such, it is defined by the mainstream of its thinkers, advocates and promoters. The current mainstream of Feminism and Liberalism is predominantly consists of Western/European thinkers, advocates and promoters who generally agree on many of the core beliefs and doctrines associated with these terms, While it is possible for someone to call themself a ‘feminist’ and not adhere to the mainstream – their views would only be fringe, and therefore unrepresentative of the term.

      However, anyone wants to argue that numbers and popularity does not define terms based upon intellectual traditions, then these terms cease to hold any meaning. One could equally call North Korea Liberal, as one could UK. This then descends into farce.

      As most linguists will acknowledge, terms, like words in a language, are defined by their mainstream uses. The mainstream of Liberalism and Feminism believe in concepts completely antithetical to Islam – and it is upon that basis that I make such a case for the avoidance of such terms.

      If however, some people reject my arguments against Feminism and Liberalism because I argue against a definition they don’t believe in, and are still adamant on using the term ‘feminism’ or ‘Liberalism’ to describe their views ‘as long as they get to define what it means’ – then sure, but just don’t tell me anything about it, what it means, or how you define it, – in fact don’t even advocate it to anyone or to me, because YOU TOO then cannot define it anymore than you allow me to. However, I do have the weight of the mainstream on my side – which gives me something to engage with. The real question is, what do you have?

    • @irshan malik

      Regardless of the definition of feminism, ‘maqasid ul sharia’ (objectives of Islamic law) allows for flexibility as long as it does not go against what is fard and it does not allow what is haram.

      basic definition of feminism; The advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.

      The Quran never mentions equality in such sense, rather the Quran mentions justice. Hence fiqh laws are based upon justice and takes into consideration the differences of gender roles.

      now if there are muslims advocating same rules for men and women in every field then they are directly going against the Shariah.

      Not every law has to have a scientific or logical reason for it to be followed.

  5. I also agree with Insha Malik. The article doesn’t seem to understand what Feminism is, and readily dubs it as based on “irrational assumptions on human nature.” Very derogatory to say the least, but thats beside the point. Also, feminism branches from sociology, which is a very diverse insight into human nature so no, feminism is NOT based on irrational assumptions. You can’t tell a non muslim that God knows human nature better therefore all of sociology makes no sense. He or she will never buy it.

    I also have a question that is why must a man provide for a woman? Does that not leave her relatively unskilled, domesticated with higher chances of being made dependent entirely on her husband. I think that leads to the concept that women must stay put at home.

    • “The article doesn’t seem to understand what Feminism is, and readily dubs it as based on “irrational assumptions on human nature.” Very derogatory to say the least, but thats beside the point. Also, feminism branches from sociology, which is a very diverse insight into human nature so no, feminism is NOT based on irrational assumptions.”

      So everything that comes from a field of study is now automatically rational? And also what is so rational about feminism? Care to point it out?

      “You can’t tell a non muslim that God knows human nature better therefore all of sociology makes no sense. He or she will never buy it.”

      Just because God knows better does not mean sociology has no value. And yes you can tell a non-muslim that God knows better about humans. You just have to explain God, His authority and why its rational to follow His authority.

      “I also have a question that is why must a man provide for a woman?”

      Because God said so? And he knows better?

      “Does that not leave her relatively unskilled, domesticated with higher chances of being made dependent entirely on her husband.”

      Unskilled? How does husband providing for her = unskilled? Just because he has to pay the bills does not mean she cant work or that she should not be educated (in fact she must be). She IS dependent on her husband. And he IS dependent on her. I am pretty sure that’s basic when it comes to marriage. That each part is not individualistic but strives to work together in harmony (Something feminism despises).

      “I think that leads to the concept that women must stay put at home.”

      Again she can work so its not that she MUST stay at home. But seriously nowadays I think women should be honest with themselves and really think about whether they have the energy to work two full time jobs (As men do…Not saying being a woman is easier). Far too many people force themselves out because they have been told by feminism that if they do not work then they are losers of some kind or that they’re husbands will abuse them (Because throwing the money you earned at him will make him stop abusing you…apparently) Of course its still very important in Islam that women be educated and have the capacity and skills to work. So that if the need arrives she can support her family.

      • I would gladly care to point out what is rational about feminism. First of all, yes because it is a study of how society runs, it makes sense. There is no such thing as black and white, unless you’re a stupid simpleton. You can’t say that the entire feminism in based on an irrational assumption. There may be a few non convincing areas, and a few convincing ones. But entirety? we don’t want to go with that.

        Right. Now what is rational about feminism? Simply, it strives to achieve rights for women, but its greater priority is to reduce rape culture, objectification and sexism towards women. They are the ones who ask questions like, “why is it legal for a man to rape his wife?” These questions raise awareness, and because they asked why it was declared illegal for a man to rape his wife. Otherwise, it was acceptable. And, it was legal for a woman to vote at the same time it was legal for her husband to rape her.

        Furthermore, feminism aims to disregard biology when studying people, because there is an ideology implemented that states that because women give birth, they are naturally kind, inherently motherly and so suited to stay home and look after children. But sociological study has areas called socialisation, that means women are not natural care-takers, they are SOCIALISED by society INTO BEING CARE TAKERS. There is nothing natural in a new born baby except a survival instinct. i.e to cry for food. Can you say a baby girl is kinder than a baby boy? No.

        Once this ideology of women as natural care taker is eradicated, it leads to a greater amount of freedom in terms of life opportunity lets say.

        As for your god knows better answer, umm. Not a great answer. By saying such a thing, thinking Muslims have a lot of unanswered questions, moreover when they seek a satisfactory answer to tell to their inquisitive non muslim peers, (such as me)they want some valuable sensible reasons.
        So, saying god knows better helps nothing.

        Next, even if she does have a job, it is regarded as something very superfluous. So, there is a high probability that women disregard working. And with skills come self esteem. And no feminism does not despise harmony, they strive for equality, when equality exists there’s going to be less of chaos, again we can’t talk of entirety.
        That comment displays your utter lack of knowledge regarding feminism. Its very diverse, it branches into liberal feminism, etc. You should look into it.

    • “You can’t tell a non muslim that God knows human nature better therefore all of sociology makes no sense. He or she will never buy it.”

      It absolutely doesn’t matter if they buy it. They don’t buy Islam either and that results in their eternal punishment. Islam is not about your vain desires, Islam is submission to the will of Allah aza wa jal, willing or unwilling. So every single last one of your efforts, whatever they may be, which oppose this deen will not increase you in any good-you will only get frustration and failure.

      “I also have a question that is why must a man provide for a woman?”

      Because Allah aza wa jal said that men are the maintainers of women and we believe in what he said. We hear and obey.

      “I think that leads to the concept that women must stay put at home.”

      The wives of the Messenger sallahualayhiwasalam stayed in their homes.

      “Furthermore, feminism aims to disregard biology when studying people, because there is an ideology implemented that states that because women give birth, they are naturally kind, inherently motherly and so suited to stay home and look after children. But sociological study has areas called socialisation, that means women are not natural care-takers, they are SOCIALISED by society INTO BEING CARE TAKERS. There is nothing natural in a new born baby except a survival instinct. i.e to cry for food. Can you say a baby girl is kinder than a baby boy? No.”

      PRECISELY. Feminism isn’t based on science (i.e. FACT) it’s based on your sick whims which go against fact and knowledge. It doesn’t matter if a newborn girl isn’t “kinder” than a newborn boy, they HAVE biological differences which HEAVILY influence their behavior(as they grow up-in case you irrational feminists haven’t realized, girls and boys aren’t always newborns) whether you like it or not. Your very statement is evidence that feminism is a farce. By abandoning biology you abandon reality and enforce your own pathetic, sick whims. All around the world women are known to be compassionate(lets make an exception for some feminists) and you people are trying to destroy nature.

      “So, saying god knows better helps nothing.”

      Allah aza wa jal says he knows better in the Quran and we believe that. So it doesn’t matter if you think it doesn’t help anything, we don’t care.

      May Allah protect this Ummah from you, your ilk, and everyone who attempts to deviate Muslims. No matter how hard you try, no matter how much you would attempt to cause failure, Allah will make this deen prevail and there is nothing but disgrace for whoever does not submit.

      • Umm…right first of all, it IS our duty to present our religion to non muslims in the best way possible, ( something you clearly won’t be able to accomplish ) so yeah saying stuff like they deserve hell and eternal punishment is just a big no. Secondly, there are non-,muslims who are far far faaaaar better than some Muslims so they don’t just get tossed into hell. Secondly, a question for YOU. When god created so much diversity in nature why would he expect such conformity and throw everyone who doesn’t conform into Hell? If you say something retarded like you don’t care and he’s god so he can do whatever he wants, PLEASE for the sake of my sanity don’t bother replying.

        And lol feminism IS A SCIENCE, its based off empirical evidence, case studies, experiments, observation you name it. I think people like you who call it a farce are actually shaking in your pants thinking women might someday get the rights they deserve. And uhhh no biology doesn’t influence anyone in a way that forces them to be unable to work, does not naturally make women kinder. If you really think biology makes such a huge difference then how the heck did so many hundred thousands of women become as successful as they did. If they were at the mercy of their biology they would just be decrepit pathetic things they are. Trying to govern and oppress someone( or women) because of their biology is plain and utter stupid and oh yes A FARCE.

        All around the world, women are known to be compassionate MAJOR LOL. Do you have even the slightest idea how some African tribes work? The gender roles are completely reversed. its the women who do all the difficult work like fishing, cutting wood, hunting and the men of those tribes stays at home and looks after children. There is NO SUCH THING as inherent nature, WOMEN ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE NOT COMPASSIONATE. Explain women thefts, women murderers, women who bury their children. Excuse me while I go ponder over how compassionate they are.

      • It looks like you don’t know Islam. Allah aza wa jal MADE IT CLEAR, that ALL disbelievers are going to hell and that their deeds are worthless on yawm al Qiyamah. If you disbelieve this after proof from the Quran came to you, you have left Islam yourself.

        Yes, He is God, he can do whatever he wants, and he PROMISED that ALL the disbelievers would be in Jahannam and that their good deeds would be USELESS to them on that day.

        For the sake of your Islam, believe it, or face the fate of the disbelievers.

        “And uhhh no biology doesn’t influence anyone in a way that forces them to be unable to work, does not naturally make women kinder.”

        Who said it makes them unable to work? You just put words into my mouth and then refute them. Poor methdology.

        And FEMINISM is NOT a science, it’s a form of social studies run usually by some non-religious biased liberals. So if you believe something in feminism which entails disbelieving something from Allah and His Messenger, you’ve created your own deen and good luck with that but in that case you’ve left Islam.

        “All around the world, women are known to be compassionate MAJOR LOL. Do you have even the slightest idea how some African tribes work? The gender roles are completely reversed. its the women who do all the difficult work like fishing, cutting wood, hunting and the men of those tribes stays at home and looks after children. There is NO SUCH THING as inherent nature, WOMEN ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE NOT COMPASSIONATE. Explain women thefts, women murderers, women who bury their children. Excuse me while I go ponder over how compassionate they are.”

        More examples of your sick mentality. Attempting to ruin humanity by imposing your sick desires which contradict Islam, contradict science and contradict the love and compassion we find from the vast EXTREME majority of mothers everywhere. An example of the sheer stupidity and irrationality of feminism is the use of minority examples like women murderers……my God, it can’t be clearer. May Allah frustrate those efforts of yours and throw them back on your entirely and protect the rest of the Ummah.

    • @ anosh

      why must a man provide for a woman?

      For a Muslim it is the duty of the man to provide for the family since the Quran says so. It in no way leaves the woman unskilled since she herself is allowed to work, train or do other halal activities.
      The spirit of the Shariah implies that men’s priority is to work for a living and pay the financial costs.

      does it not seem as a benefit that men provide for women? or else women will have too much work (pay bills, raise children, look after family).

      I agree due to global financial crisis it is good for both genders to work within same families. Also it helps women to learn new skills, be independent.

      However if a couple are raising a family , then according to ‘maqasid ul sharia’ (objectives of Islamic law); the women’s priority is to look after her children/ domestic duties while men’s priority is provide.

  6. My opinion is that feminism is a term without definition…as a result, people in different geographical locations and cultures may perhaps define it as they will…………….

    Western feminism has been a quest to overturn man-made laws that created injustice, Islamic “feminism” is a quest to reclaim God-given rights that became lost or abused over time.

    However, IMO, the term “feminism” even if broadly defined as “advocacy for women’s rights” is somewhat problematic—(and that is why “Islamic” gets attached to it). This is because under Islam/Quran, all humanity is created equal and Jihad (to strive for justice and against oppression) is a responsibility of all humans of every generation. Thus, a group or organization that advocates for justice for only one segment (excluding others) may be problematic in the Islamic context. Advocates must recognize that God-given rights belong to all sections of society, both men and women and minorities and handicapped and…etc…..

    It is my opinion that Quranic “feminism” is a wholistic system best suited to the needs and happiness of both genders. For example, the practice of Maher, lack of financial obligations, and inheritance create a situation where women could be independently wealthy—related laws facilitate the use and investment of this wealth for profit—thereby giving women options. If women can independently grow and manage wealth, the stress and pressure on men as primary providers can be somewhat reduced leading to happier lives for both men and women.
    If women can generate wealth through investments or owning their own business, then their time is flexible enough that various obligations can be managed without the stressful “superwoman” syndrome in which women need to work full-time (often without childcare options), then care for children, spouses, elderly, and home maintenance…….The reason their time can be flexible is because they are not obligated to provide for their families and therefore are not under pressure to perform……..for example, a woman who likes to cook might bottle her own jams and jellies and sell them in her free time, or a group of women can get together, pool their wealth, and invest in a small bottling operation run by a professional manager…….on the other hand, women who do not care for obligations of childcare or home maintenance, can delegate these duties (for ex, the Prophet (pbuh) was brought up by a wetnurse) and pursue a satisfying career……..This is possible if gender roles could be negotiated in the marriage contract.

    Regardless of what appears as privileges for women—the reality of pregnancy and early childcare means a large chunk of a woman’s life is put on hold/heavily constrained. Because this is a biological reality, there is no escaping it unless the couple chooses to remain childless. Thus, even if a woman were to pursue a satisfying longterm carreer—her needs will be inescapably different from those of a man…..

  7. WOW. I’m on Youtube right now and I’m finding out that EVEN AMONG DISBELIEVERS, there is now a backlash against modern feminism. It’s not just me seeing them for their incredible stupidity, their opposition to science and their extremism.

    Alhamdulilah, Allah is so merciful he’s even showing disbelievers how deviated these people are……now that is something!!!

    Honestly, I am totally happy. It’s a pleasant surprise!

  8. Oh my God, this couldn’t get any better. Apparently I’m not the only one astounded at the stupidity, baselessness and anti-science/anti-fact attitude of feminists.

    Man this is great!!!!!!

    GamesLegitament1 week ago

    “… is part of patriarchy.”
    I would like to counter that. I think it’s part of biology. 
    Reply · 2

    The Sandre Guy1 week ago

    But… Biology is sexist ;)
    Reply · 5

  9. Looks like scientists are pretty anti feminist as well………..LOL.

    Oh my God, I can’t express my giddiness. Surprise after surprise. It turns out I’m not the only one who sees feminism for what it is-a total psuedo social study(NOT a science to anyone with ANY understanding of the term) which is heavily influence by a minority of women who have deep psychological issues or are just plain deviants-religiously and socially.

    I mean, these people are so screwed up, they think gender is a social construct.

  10. Aya ay ayy

    There are moments in life that Allah aza wa jal pleasantly surprises people.

    Noam Chompsky DEMOLISHES feminism. In like a minute. This pathetic psuedo-science is DESTROYED by Chompsky.

  11. Richard Feynman talking about psuedo-science.

    Yes, feminism, if anything, is a psuedo-science.

    It’s amazing…………….Allahu akbar. These intelligent people who actually KNOW something…….

    People like feminists are INVENTORS OF THE MIND. They IMAGINE reality and put it into science format. Like Noam Chomsky explained earlier, they copy the form.

    But it isn’t IN THE SLIGHTEST based on reality or science….it’s fiction!!!!

  12. Lastly, for the people who Allah hasn’t blessed with intelligence, whose minds are simply to small to comprehend that

    1) Feminism is not science, it’s an ideology

    2) Feminism contradicts science and reality

    3) Feminism contradicts common sense, for anyone who failed to comprehend the above two points

    So for anyone who couldn’t get the above three………

    Feminism is AGAINST Islam except for the portion of it that doesn’t oppose this deen.

    And thus, it is ENTIRELY un-needed. We already have a Furqan to decide between right and wrong. Therefore, feminism is ENTIRELY USELESS at BEST, and KUFR at worst.

    It’s not necessary to refute disbelievers on their own terms because what Allah and His Messenger commanded us is enough. Disbelievers are destined to the fire of Jahannam forever. They are imprisoned and can never get out. Their opinions are irrelevant. Either they submit and know the truth or they reject it and get disgrace.

    • Funny, cause Islam is the useless un-needed religion atm. Not to mention, a great chunk of muslims are destined for hell fire where they can’t escape. Toooo bad. They are killing people and what not. At least there is the hope that feminists who fight for human rights are destined for heaven.

      • Not feminist non-Muslims.

        Sorry Anosh.

      • By the way, saying Islam a useless un-needed religion is kufr. It is needed because it is the ONLY way for anyone to enter Paradise. All the deeds of the disbelievers will be dust on the day of Resurrection.

        Muslims who enter the fire will come out eventually. However all disbelievers will enter it and will never come out, This is what Allah and His Messenger promised and Allah and His Messenger never break promises. Allah will perfect his light even if you hate it.

    • Also, you are like the non muslims who learn islam through the media and therefore hate it. You learn feminism through the media and hate it too, even though you know nothing about it. How about you stop being an asshole and read something. Cause you’re just making a fool out of yourself here.God is rolling her his eyes at you I guarantee it. That being said, I feel sorry for your wife or to-be wife, unless she already divorced you.. Please don’t reproduce..

      • Peace. And Allah isn’t a “she” and never referred to himself as such and never attributed to Himself a gender. He created genders and referred to himself as a “he”.

        And your insults won’t hurt anyone but yourself. You and your feminists friends have failed against intelligent(more like….sane disbelievers who know what SCIENCE is) and ordinary disbelievers……how on earth do you think you will ever win against Muslims? No matter how many Muslims you attempt to deviate, you will only harm yourself. For every Muslim that loses his deen at the hands of feminists, there are more willing to take His place and be firm upon the truth and acting on the command of Allah aza wa jal. You will NEVER win.

        Those Muslims who kill innocents are committing wrong and those who leave Islam are committing wrong. One wrong doesn’t justify another.

        مَنْ عَمِلَ صَالِحًا فَلِنَفْسِهِ ۖ وَمَنْ أَسَاءَ فَعَلَيْهَا ۖ ثُمَّ إِلَىٰ رَبِّكُمْ تُرْجَعُونَ

        Whoever does a good deed – it is for himself; and whoever does evil – it is against the self. Then to your Lord you will be returned.

Trackbacks

  1. The Feminist Furqan (criteria) replacing Allah's Furqan (Quran … | Follow the quran
  2. The Feminist criteria replacing Allah’s Qur’an | Siyasah Press
  3. Maajid Nawaz, the BBC and the UK Muslim Community (part 1) « Abdullah al Andalusi
  4. Maajid Nawaz, the BBC and the UK Muslim Community (part 1) | The Muslim Debate Initiative Blog
  5. Does Myriam Francois-Cerrah Hate Her Religion? | United Muslims Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: